 |
Alice, child with dreaming eyes, Noting things that come to pass Turvey-wise in Wonderland Backwards through a Looking-Glass. ♠ Saki, The Westminster Alice ♣ |  |
|
[ 100428 ] nocturne, King Pear – Alexandra Cabot reappeared in L&O: SVU, so I wiki'd >> Casey Novak >> Diane Neal, whose entry specifically states "She is a redhead." // Though I'm sure Amy was in my subconscious. 28 Aries 10 07:07 [ 100428 ] Ian, the Blue Berry Timothy – Did Amy trigger this? 28 Aries 10 06:47 [ 091026 ] andrew – thx 11 Aquarius 10 21:09 [ 080711 ] anon – i read your text. I'm not your friend. And i fell in here because i was looking for Pania Rose pictures. // Ah i'm also a male, so your tactic kinda worked. 25 Capricorn 10 11:45 [ 091107 ] nocturne – I'm sorry, I have no clue what you mean. Please try again. 08 Scorpio 2k9 10:15 …more…  |
 |
 |  | |||||||||||||||||
 |
Now that I’m officially a prominent blogger – surely being the only blogger to have sunk a ship makes me at least as prominent as Yamamoto or Dewey (I sunk a registered ship, mind you, not some anyhow sampan) – I’ve realised that, soon, PR companies will start handing me ang-paos (for luck) to say nice things about their products. I’ve decided to start the ball rolling by writing about the good experiences I’ve had with entirely random things. The PR companies will thus know that I am capable of showcasing their product – whatever it may be – in a favourable light. Hypothetically, a favourable review from someone who has publicly confessed to being open to “incentives” might, instead, cast the company as being one that pays people to say good things about them. This could be terribly negative, even scandalous, should the bacteriosphere decide to pick up on it and harp endlessly about the lack of ethics of such a company. In such a hypothetical, totally unexpected scenario, I suppose, theoretically, seeing as you can’t exactly sue someone for saying good things about you, the companies involved might want to – oh, I don’t know – pay that someone to stop. Strictly hypothetically, of course. Even more strictly hypothetically, that amount had better be generous, generous enough to get an otherwise upright person to participate in such morally questionable behaviour as being paid not to blog, and generous enough for that someone not to blog about not blogging about it (the infinite regression of this theoretical situation – the “buying silence on buying silence loop” – gives you a vague idea of the kind of generosity involved).
 On a mildly related note, this is the first line of Mr Wong Kan Seng’s bio on cabinet.gov.sg. Born and raised in Singapore since 1946, Mr Wong Kan Seng…Turns out, before 1946, Mr Wong was born and raised elsewhere. This, to me, is a matter of grave concern (or, possibly, cradle concern). Perhaps Mr Wong might like to address exactly where else had he been born or raised? Or is this simply an example of the supermortal status of Mr Wong, who is but the current incarnation of a long line of Buddhist Masters? If so, does he have a reincarnation license? Feetnote: 1 Obligatory Cow Year Reference
789 words / 1304
Oh, kiss me beneath the milky twilight. Lead me out on the moonlit floor. Lift your open hand. Strike up the band and make the fireflies dance, silver moon’s sparkling. So kiss me.
| |||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Things that fall contrariwise, Difficult to understand Darkly through a Looking-Glass Turvey-wise in Wonderland ♠ Saki, The Westminster Alice ♣ | |
