Alice, child with dreaming eyes,
   Noting things that come to pass
Turvey-wise in Wonderland
   Backwards through a Looking-Glass.
♠ Saki, The Westminster Alice
[ 100428 ] nocturne, King Pear – Alexandra Cabot reappeared in L&O: SVU, so I wiki'd >> Casey Novak >> Diane Neal, whose entry specifically states "She is a redhead." // Though I'm sure Amy was in my subconscious.
28 Aries 10 07:07
[ 100428 ] Ian, the Blue Berry Timothy – Did Amy trigger this?
28 Aries 10 06:47
[ 091026 ] andrew – thx
11 Aquarius 10 21:09
[ 080711 ] anon – i read your text. I'm not your friend. And i fell in here because i was looking for Pania Rose pictures. // Ah i'm also a male, so your tactic kinda worked.
25 Capricorn 10 11:45
[ 091107 ] nocturne – I'm sorry, I have no clue what you mean. Please try again.
08 Scorpio 2k9 10:15
…more…
by Arthur Rackham
Worthy
30 Can♋er 2k8, Woden’s Day ♣
lost soul designs
eyes ♥ paradiso
dreaming ♥ Alice :: Wide-Eyed Wonder
The Sleeping Dragon
♥ Believe the Hype ♥
“the cat! the BUTTERFLIES! the anime!”
Wendy, 080410

nu ««»» next 5
powered by love
2k8 Cancer :: And the people bowed and prayed, to the neon God they made
Bottled Pussy Juice
[ ]
31 Cancer 2k8, Thor's Day
Samantha Poh vs IcyQueenGoddess over Kenny Sia
[ ]
31 Cancer 2k8, Thor's Day
(Worthy)
[ ]
30 Cancer 2k8, Woden's Day
Miley Cyrus, 7 Things
[ ]
29 Cancer 2k8, Tyr's Day
Hallelujah
[ ]
28 Cancer 2k8, Moon's Day
♥ Selected ♥
LinkLove
Polls
About Me
in verse

flavours
2k9 2k8 2k7 2k6 2k5 2k4 2k3 2k2 2k1 2k 99 Cap♑corn Aqu♒rius Pi♓es A♈ies Ta♉rus Ge♊ini Can♋er Le♌ Vi♍o Lib♎a Sco♏pio Sagi♐arius SunLord Moon Tyr Woden Thor Frigg Saturn
…you say “go slow,” i fall behind / the second hand unwinds…
Fair Points
36 - Ian, the Blue Berry
34 - Grievous, the Grapevine Spider
21 - Priss, Berry Berry
19 - nanashee, Baroness Banana
18 - ken
16 - Piper
14 - k, the Aged ElderBerry
12 - Wendy
3 - Marquis
3 - Demasque

TopOfBlogs

A few weeks ago, I arose from sleep with a line in my head. And I thought to myself, Wow, you’re a bleeding genius, you are. I was all enthused and going to write it down and bask in the glory that is self-satisfaction.

And, in that beatitude, I reached the fullness of the Wake, and that beautiful line, and such a beautiful line – “loved with a love that was more than love” – I realised, not to be mine.

But it’s such a simple line, isn’t it? Anybody could have written it, but, in the thousand years of the English language, it was Poe who wrote it into the pages of history, in Annabel Lee.

Greatness is Human

Hercules may have slain the Nemean Lion, but we prefer Tiger Woods. Superman may be faster than a speeding bullet, but, really, we prefer Roger Federer’s launching of the balls. Do we like Christian Bale for being Batman, or for acting as Batman?

At some level, while the stories of the legends inspire, the heroes are those who live and breathe, who walk amongst us. Once they, too, die and fade into the pages of myth, we care so much less. Alan Turing vs Bill Gates? Or even vs Kevin Rose?

The great have to be human. We want to believe that they’re not too far away, that they are living our lives, that – had a tiny, small thing happened when we were young – their path is ours.

Anyone could have done this, but it is this guy who did. This guy is really not that much different from me.

Feats are Easy

I’m good at what I do. If writing were golf, I’m surely not Woods, I’m not even a pro-player, but, when me and my small group of friends gather at the club every week, I’m amongst the best of them.

Even in this tiny group, when the topic comes up, it comes up in the form of “I can’t write like you; I’m not as talented”. It’s not talent, and I keep saying that, but nobody believes it. You can tell that they don’t want to believe it – that they’d rather believe me to be humble (uh-huh) – rather than accept that I’ve spent most of my life in devotion to my craft (fuck art; writing is like carpentry). They refuse to accept that I’m good at what I do in the exact same way that they are good at whatever it is they do that isn’t as meaningful as writing and can’t impress the chicks.

This is not to say that I’m not a brilliant writer, or that I’m not talented, just that I’m no more talented than any of the other bloggers I read. So don’t take it as a sign that I don’t feel worthy of your adoration, and don’t take it as a sign that you shouldn’t send me naked pictures of yourself (females only, please – I can’t stress this enough. This means YOU, lonelyboi84.)

The Feats have to look easy; have to look effortless. People like to see tenacity but they so much prefer to watch the tenacious meet his match, at the hands of the master.

People want to believe that greatness is easy, that the deeds of the great come from some God-given talent.

Models may be born beautiful, but most of them work at it, they watch their diet, they work out. Maybe their life is easier than the life of Sweatshop Worker #17, but it’s not as easy as we’d imagine it to be.

Anyone could have done this, but it is this guy who did. This guy is lucky because he’s born talented.

Pudding

You actually get to see this in action in reality contests such as So You Think You Can Dance, Last Comic Standing and, presumably, Somewhere Idol. While some people go to the auditions for a lark, others take offence, or are utterly stunned, that the judges don’t think they’re good enough.

They simply think that the judges are, for some reason (too tall?), picking on them. They don’t seem to notice that the people who make it to the final rounds, when asked “How long have you been doing this?”, answer “Five years.”, “Eight years.”

That those who make it have had training, have had professional experience, have devoted their lives to this singular calling. And these people think they can come on stage and wow the judges, just because they can wow their group of friends, just because what they see on the show looks so easy.

Arise, Bread

We live in an age where the old axiom of “nothing travels faster than bad news” is truer than ever. Thanks to the Internet, bad news travels really fucking fast.

Because of the speed and spread of bad news – scandals – the mainstream media has to pick up on it, or risk losing its relevance, and, with that, its credibility. Ironically, in the process of reporting the scandals, it actually lends its credibility to the scandals.

Fame is the measure of worthiness. I could be the best writer in the world, but, if no one thinks so, am I? Someone has to witness the falling tree. Lots of people have to agree that it fell. Lots of people have to agree that it fell wonderfully.

The flipside of the nature of Greatness – that Feats are easy and only the human are truly Great – means that the great are measured by our own standards. We expect them to live up to our own expectations.

This really isn’t all that much.

We expect them not to steal, we expect them not to have children at 16, that kind of thing.

In exchange for fame (which has its rewards), we expect them not to let us down. When they do, that’s when the bloodbath begins, once he who is without fame casts the first stone.

It’s really like bread. When bread rises, it is the smell of bread, the idea of bread, not the substance of it, that promises.

You might think that Paris Hilton isn’t really good at anything. She’s a failure at acting, a failure at singing, and a failure at being a human being. But she’s Great at being Paris Hilton. And we, the people, want, in addition to our actors and our singers, at least one Paris Hilton.

Outside the fame-expectations social compact, but as a mechanism for the enforcement of it, fame makes the famous live in the public eye. So, people like me, who make value judgments on the private lives of public figures, get to make value judgements on your private life.

Also, people might want to take pictures of your private privates, and then make them public.

This is Emma Watson, when she went out to celebrate her 18th birthday. Lines being lines, a mere day before, this picture would be illegal as child-porn. Now, however, it leads to witty captioning.

Emma Watson Upskirt
Witty Caption – Insert wand to achieve Harmonie.

In reply to Ian’s “Leave Dawn Yang Alone”, she lied. This wasn’t a girl with feet of clay, this was a girl who put herself on a pedestal made entirely of clay. It wasn’t someone who became famous on merit and then failed. It was fame via fraud. This is entirely the result of her naivety in thinking she could get away with it. She cheated us and now we want our pound of flesh. There is no other way her story could have ended. Dawn Yang’s story isn’t Cinderella. It’s really a cautionary tale.

All About Me

My three readers will have noticed I go to great lengths to quickly squash any rumours of credibility, intellectualism and all of the assorted maturity-thingies. It’s called managing expectations. I can lie with impunity because anyone who takes my word for anything is stupid.

If this post makes sense to you, it’s not because I’m right, it’s because I’m believable. That’s what good fiction is. I really do just make things up.

TagTeam [ ]
« Samantha Poh vs IcyQueenGoddess over Kenny Sia « » Miley Cyrus, 7 Things »
lonelyboi84 – oh so you HAVE been receiving my pictures. was beginning to worry at the lack of response... =/
30 Cancer 2k8 04:06
nocturne, King Pear – @lonelyboi84 GO AWAY. Man-boobs aren't counted as boobs.
30 Cancer 2k8 04:42
nanashee, Baroness Banana – ...the message board managed to upstage the actual post. what the hey?!
30 Cancer 2k8 08:02
nocturne – I KNOW. I spend all this time writing on the human condition and my dear readers zoom in on the single most outrageous line - "apple vs vader", "crashing a community into a building"...
30 Cancer 2k8 12:25
lonelyboi84 – well i used to have REAL boobs...
30 Cancer 2k8 16:58
Ian, the Blue Berry Timothy – Great post. But I think it is a cycle. We actually do want them to let us down. To let us know they are human after all, not so perfect, just like us. Then we want them to redeem themselves, because we want to believe, that we too can be like them. Anyway, yeah..she may have lied...but like I said, that's why it is called mercy.
31 Cancer 2k8 00:30
nocturne – @Ian The Mercy Argument can be used for anyone and everyone; to pinpoint Dawn with it is to imply she’s more deserving than, say, Deathrow Inmate #17. Once “deserving” comes in, you move away from Mercy towards Justice. The idea that we want them to fail implies that we want ALL STARS to fail, but we clearly don’t. We hold different stars to different standards – when Paris Hilton does something, nobody really cares; when Miley Cyrus does the same, everybody cares. They have roles. The Redemption narrative may hold true for Chris Lee (local, not Dracula), but it does not for Dawn Yang – you yourself said that she cannot not lose. Her narrative is that we want her to fail because we enjoy watching her fail - “how the mighty have fallen”, the “comeuppance”, the Karmic Retribution. It is not “not so perfect, just like us”, it is “Now, finally, I am better than you” - we don’t want them to be “just like us”, we want to be better than they are, in spite of their fame and their fortune; it’s the same urge that make stupid people turn racist. Scandals, to stars, are like scandals to normal folk; accidents. Something that just happens, and, likely, could have been avoided. It’s who it hits that really matters.
@lonelyboi84 Take your continuum problem and GO AWAY.
31 Cancer 2k8 01:35
Ian Timothy – I concede the point that not all stars/famous people have the same narrative and that we do hold them to different standards based on their own actions. Regarding the mercy argument, you are right, it can be used for anyone and everyone. Everyone is deserving of mercy - everyone deserves to get kindness even though they may not deserve the kindness. When we decide how much mercy to accord or rather how much of the full weight of justice not to inflict, we aren't moving away from mercy to justice because they are both linked. They don't exist on extreme ends of the same line in isolation. You can't talk about mercy without talking about justice. So, the question is then, how much mercy and yes, that question does involve some consideration of whether sufficient justice has been served in the context of the actions done. errr..on a side note..damn hard to type long stuff in your comment box...
31 Cancer 2k8 02:11
nocturne – Once you accept that Mercy is not isolated from Justice, you have given up the position of "unconditional mercy". In Dawn Yang's case, unconditional mercy is pretty much the only mercy that can be given. Once you move to the sliding slope that is Mercy-Justice, everything becomes subjective, and it becomes difficult for people to agree on how much mercy she deserves (or how much justice she should avoid). For ease of use, we try to avoid slopes, where we have to draw lines (good post on the desire lines, btw, it's nice to have a name to put on a concept). Virtue is always black and white. Your argument would carry more weight if your position is that she has "paid enough", rather than that she is deserving of mercy (or that no one deserves the retribution being meted out to her). The idea that Justice has been served is more appealing than that of Mercy and forgiveness. I agree with the comment box; I type into a txt file and cutpaste. I'm not fond of long pages.
31 Cancer 2k8 02:37
1318 words / 6595


shop@noctalis
BUY Borderlands
Borderlands

BUY Metro 2033
Metro 2033

BUY Pro Evolution Soccer 2010
Pro Evolution Soccer 2010

 
 
Your Ad Here

“There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them.”


 
 network.noctalis :: American McGee's Alice 
Things that fall contrariwise,
Difficult to understand
Darkly through a Looking-Glass
Turvey-wise in Wonderland
♠ Saki, The Westminster Alice

shop@noctalis
BUY Metro 2033
Metro 2033

BUY Far Cry
Far Cry

BUY SiN Episodes: Emergence
SiN Episodes: Emergence

nu in noctalis :: Command & Conquer Red Alert 3 | SPORE | Medieval II Total War
Download Free Casual Games :: Peggle | PopCap Games